Wide Appeal for Ultra-Widescreen Displays

For the past few years, Microsoft Teams has been promoting 21:9 ultra-widescreen displays as a more inclusive viewing experience for videoconferencing rooms. Indeed, the 21:9 format offers approximately 31% more horizontal display area than a 16:9 screen of the same vertical height. This is why 21:9 displays are being used to support Microsoft Teams’ Front Row feature, along with immersive gaming and eye-catching video presentations.

However, despite the eye-catching ultra-widescreen advantages, Keith Yanke, Sharp’s VP of product and solutions marketing, told SCN that traditional displays significantly outsell 21:9 displays.

That assessment is endorsed by Rob Meiner, Peerless-AV’s senior technical solutions engineer. “While 21:9 displays are gaining popularity and increasing in demand," he explained, "traditional 16:9 displays remain predominant in many categories, as ultra-wide displays are still considered a more specialized offering. Recent reports project market growth for ultra-widescreen displays at a compound annual growth rate [CAGR] of around 10% from 2026 to 2033.”

So, what happened? “After the initial announcement from Microsoft, the topic of 21:9 display solutions was common, but it never really translated into additional sales,” offered Rob Pickering, Tritech’s director of technology. “Some clients may install one or two specialty rooms to validate the experience but keep the majority at 16:9.”

Compelling Applications

Despite 21:9’s slow sales growth, there are many compelling Pro AV applications for the technology. The standout application is in conference rooms and hybrid meeting spaces that use Microsoft Teams in the Front Row layout, or other UC solutions that benefit from ultra-wide video and graphics presentations.

A key advantage of the 21:9 aspect ratio in these spaces is its ability to boost productivity and streamline multitasking. As Meiner noted, “It’s especially beneficial for professionals managing multiple spreadsheets, communication platforms, creative assets, and organizational dashboards simultaneously. Compared to a dual-monitor setup, a single ultra-wide display offers a more seamless and cohesive layout, eliminating visual interruptions that can come from misaligned screens. By consolidating content on one clean display, users can improve focus, reduce eyestrain, and work more efficiently and accurately.”

“Using ultra-widescreen displays can avoid the downfalls of dual screen setups by not having a bezel,” Yanke agreed. “In some cases, this setup provides a better experience for content and collaboration.”

Plus, the "wow" factor should not be discounted. “Spaces with 21:9 displays can create a more immersive feeling and provide more pixels when sharing documents on screen,” said Pickering. “Since they’re not super common, they can also create an elevated feeling when first participating in the space.”

21:9 displays are well suited to non-videoconferencing applications as well. “This ultra-wide format provides graphic designers, photo and video editors, and other creative professionals with a more ergonomic workspace, ideal for displaying timelines, tools, full mockups, and side-by-side comparisons on a single screen,” Meiner said. “Professionals who frequently work with large spreadsheets or detailed data sets, such as financial analysts, can also take advantage of the ability to view multiple windows simultaneously without the need to toggle between them or use an additional monitor."

In educational environments, ultra-wide displays can enhance classroom settings by enabling the display of multiple content types, such as lecture videos alongside slides, simultaneously. "This facilitates student interaction and offers a more immersive experience, particularly in hybrid learning scenarios,” Meiner added.

Finally, 21:9 displays also provide Pro AV integrators and managers with greater operational flexibility in AV integration. This is because 21:9 displays can show multiple simultaneous video sources without requiring operators to switch inputs or add extra screens during immersive presentations. This makes 21:9 displays particularly useful in high-engagement business settings such as training rooms, command centers, and client pitch environments.

Installation and Cost Considerations

Compared to traditional 16:9 displays, 21:9 displays are physically wider and heavier. This means that they require larger and more robust wall mounts that can support their size and weight. “It doesn't necessarily complicate installation, but there might be some unique considerations, such as having an extra person to help lift the display because it's so wide,” said Jeff Muto, director of product management with ViewSonic Corporation.

“In smaller rooms, ultra-wide screens may also present viewing angle challenges for people seated at the edges,” Meiner added. “This is where curved 21:9 displays offer an advantage, by helping to maintain consistent visibility across a wider viewing area.”

Adding a 21:9 video format to a room’s playout system can also pose problems. As Meiner observed, many software applications and user interfaces, such as videoconferencing apps, are primarily designed for the standard 16:9 aspect ratio.

Plus, most videos are not 21:9. “Content compatibility can be an issue,” added Yanke. “Standard 16:9 material may not scale properly on a 21:9 display, leading to stretched images or black bars on the sides when content doesn’t match the ultra-wide format.”

Beyond these factors, Muto said cost is the primary drawback. 21:9 displays cost more than 16:9 displays—not just because they are larger, but also because they are not being produced in the same volumes. As a result, mass-produced 16:9 displays benefit from per-unit economies of scale that niche-produced 21:9 displays do not.

Is 32:9 the Answer?

The 21:9 display format was created to provide a wider viewing experience than 16:9 monitors, but it does so using a format that doesn't always play nice with 16:9 content. This is why 32:9 “super ultra-wide TVs” are now being produced. The advantage of this format is that it can display two 16:9 video streams side-by-side in their original aspect ratios, like having two regular 16:9 monitors together without the distracting center bezel.

“This is why 32:9 is definitely a thing,” said Muto. “However, a single, super ultra-wide 32:9 panel can present some logistical challenges, especially in terms of mounting and transport. This is why ViewSonic offers a flexible alternative with our LDC series dvLED displays, which are configurable to achieve a 32:9 layout.”

“We see more of a need for 32:9 than 21:9,” noted Yanke. “With that said, whether it is 21:9 or 32:9, we are not sure these solutions are catching on outside of those spaces that require these wide aspect ratios. But yes: The 32:9 is more appealing because of the ability to simulate two 16:9 screens side by side.”

Given the above considerations, the experts agree that 21:9 displays will remain niche for now. “While wider displays are gaining momentum in meeting rooms, hybrid work setups, learning environments, and productivity-intensive roles, they are unlikely to fully replace the widespread use of 16:9 displays,” said Meiner. “Standard consumer TVs, typical office setups, and classrooms equipped with 16:9 projectors or flat panels are much more well-established and may remain the norm for the foreseeable future.”

“21:9 display sales are growing, but there is a long way to go before it can be considered mainstream,” Muto concluded. “In the short term, 21:9 will remain niche due to some of the things discussed like price and content compatibility. But if hybrid meetings continue to be the norm, we'll likely see greater adoption of 21:9 devices in meeting/conference rooms as displays are refreshed.”

Get even more insights: Download SCN's Integration Guide to Video Displays and Mounts.