Reversal of Fortune: The Wide-Ranging Impacts of the Net Neutrality Reversal

Publish date:
Social count:
Image placeholder title

Peter Jackson, CEO of Bluescape (bluescape.comOn December 14th, 2017, the Federal Communications Commission repealed “net neutrality,” the 2015 Open Internet Order that classified broadband service as a utility covered by Title II of the Communications Act. The goal of the 2015 net neutrality order was to protect the “open internet.” The objective of the 2017 repeal, as stated by the FCC, is “restoring internet freedom.” Both are worthy goals, so why is everyone up in arms?

Imagine the internet is the system of roads we use every day to get to work, run errands, visit family and friends, etc. Now that the internet has been “freed” a third party can decide which roads you can use and which you can’t. In this case the third party is likely to be a handful of broadband companies including AT&T, Comcast and Verizon, among a few others. They can now create bundles of internet access services much like how we purchase cable TV today: North and South interstates are included in the basic package, but if you want to go East or West—or on any local roads—you’ll have to pay more. Imagine subscribing to a bundle of social media sites for $20/month and another $50/month for streaming video and $35 for a bundle of news sites…you get the picture. How much are you, the consumer, willing to pay?

Let’s dig into the business and economic impacts of the repeal further. For years, businesses have been rapidly adopting cloud-based applications ranging from accounting software to content collaboration and ideation systems. Some of these systems are aimed at improving employee productivity, and some are designed to enhance the customer experience. Regardless of what the applications do, the reversal of net neutrality will directly affect the ability of companies of all sizes to meet the continually evolving expectations of their customers.

For smaller businesses and those in the growing gig economy, this decision could be devastating. The “open internet” essentially leveled the playing field and enabled business of all sizes to compete, globally. With the so-called “free internet” (as the FCC is billing the repeal decision), instead of providing an equal opportunity for all to reach potential customers, the internet becomes an expensive channel only big business can afford. Entire business models of today’s fastest growing companies could soon no longer be viable.

Moreover, the digital workplace as we know it is subject to potentially catastrophic change. As the internet matured, it has become an integral part of how we all work and conduct business—Can you imagine not having unfettered internet access? I can’t, nor can I comprehend how this decision is good for our customers here at Bluescape. We help companies and geographically dispersed team conceptualize, model and develop new products and innovations more effectively with greater success outcomes through digital workspaces. The internet enables our business, just as the internet has surely come to enable yours.

Image placeholder title

One of the arguments in favor of the recent decision is that prior to the 2015 regulation none of the service providers engaged in the practice of throttling access. And some providers have pledged that they will not change their practices and begin blocking or throttling websites as a result of the FCC’s decision. That’s great, but we all know publicly traded companies are beholden to their shareholders and continually under pressure to increase profits. What happens if they change their minds and decide to leverage their position of power? There is nothing to stop them unless the FCC is willing to engage in reactive policing.

There is no question that the massive changes in how we communicate, consume content and interact with each other do require some policy changes to stay current, just not this one. Internet access can’t be a political football that is punted around by every new administration.

Despite fiery rhetoric on all sides, too few will ultimately gain from the repeal of this legislation and as the financial, economic and employment impacts are realized, people will rise up. It’s time to update legislation to meet the realities of the twenty-first century before it’s too late.

Peter Jackson is the CEO of Bluescape.


Meeting of the Minds promo image

The Gatekeepers

In the professional AV industry, from ISE to InfoComm, systems integrators get a lot of fanfare. Rightfully so.

Tech Manager Call for Speakers: NYC AV/IT Leadership Summit promo image

Tech Manager Call for Speakers: NYC AV/IT Leadership Summit

AV/IT Talks are short (10 minutes in length), TED-inspired presentations. Each AV/IT Talk succinctly and passionately shares a recent AV/IT case study, design plan, new paradigm, and or challenge/solution. A brief Q&A follows each AV/IT Talk. The NYC AV/IT Leadership Summit audience will be approximately 80-90 attendees.

Image placeholder title

SXSW, Net Neutrality, and the Future of Innovation

At SXSW Interactive, it’s impossible to have a Panel session with the title “Remember When the Internet Was Free?” and not have it veer from a look at specific recent policy and market developments into a session involving hand wringing and existential musing on the very nature of the Internet.

Net Neutrality - Why Do I Care? Why Should You? promo image

Net Neutrality - Why Do I Care? Why Should You?

On Thursday, December 14, 2017, the Federal Communications Commission voted three to two (3-2) to repeal the rulings protecting net neutrality passed in 2015. Your internal monologue might be asking, “Why do I care?”. Net neutrality impacts everyone’s communications ability, choices, and processes. It impacts your ability to communicate. These impacts are not just personal, but can easily impact business as well.

ProAV CEOs Respond to the Net Neutrality Repeal promo image

ProAV CEOs Respond to the Net Neutrality Repeal

On December 14, 2017, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted to repeal the Open Internet Order, effectively ending the net neutrality provisions that classified consumer broadband service as a public utility under the Title II Order of the Communications Act of 1934.