Retail Caught in the Cold War on Drugs - AvNetwork.com

Retail Caught in the Cold War on Drugs

Author:
Publish date:

Retail Caught in the Cold War on Drugs
By Tim Buchholz

The first big retail cold and flu season since the Combat Meth Act of 2005 was enacted is in full swing. The Combat Meth Act is federal legislation that was signed into law and implemented in September of 2006. As a result, manufacturers and retailers of many cold, allergy and cough remedy products have had to adjust their operations and marketing efforts to comply with new regulations. At the same time, the industry is working to minimize confusion and inconvenience for the shopper who may already be suffering with sneezes and a running nose as they look for a product that is now under lock and key.
At the root of the problem is the illegal drug methamphetamine ("Meth"). Over 12 million people in the US have said they have tried the drug according to the National Study on Drug Use and Health, with over 600,000 users identified when this legislation was first discussed in 2004.
Illegal Meth labs have sprung up all over the US, but especially in rural America, where the telltale smell from the manufacturing process raises few red flags. Cold, allergy and cough remedies containing pseudoephedrine, like Sudafed and Claritin-D, have been one of the main ingredients in the manufacturing process.
Pseudoephedrine is a decongestant that has been used in over the counter medicines for years. It has been used in combination with pain relievers like ibuprofen (Advil / Motrin) and acetaminophen (Tylenol), as well as any cough/decongestant remedy with PE in its name.
According to the U.S. government, the ready supply of pseudoephedrine at your local drug store or grocer fueled the problem. Before the US Congress started to work on this legislation, a number of states had enacted similar laws, with good results. According to government statistics Meth production in those states had dropped significantly when similar laws where enacted.
The Combat Meth Act of 2005 was co-sponsored by Senator Jim Talent, a Missouri Republican, and California Democrat Senator Dianne Finstein, as part of the renewal of the USA Patriot Act. President Bush signed the act into law on March 9, 2006, and it became effective in September. The act avoided pseudoephedrine being classified as a Schedule V narcotic, requiring a prescription. The act created a new DEA classification to make it harder on illegal use of the drug, while allowing consumers to get the medicine they need without the hassle of a prescription.
But to help manage control of distribution, retailers must:
1. Locate the products behind the counter or in a locked case.
2. Require customers to show identification and sign a logbook
3. Limit customers to purchases of up to 9 grams of pseudoephedrine a month and no more than 3.6 grams in a single day.

And so, the industry adapts. Manufacturers have introduced new products that do not fall under these restrictions, while offering the original formulation behind the counter. Some manufacturers modified their formulas and have created sub-brands with ingredients such as phenylephrine. This allows them to offer products on the shelves which are not restricted. Others have run advertising campaigns to reinforce the power of the original product’s formula while reassuring the consumer that the added effort to buy the original formula is worth the effort. But for many consumers, phenylephrine doesn’t work as well nor does it provide the longer-lasting relief that pseudoephedrine does.
Some retailers have adapted their stores by moving the cold aisle closer to the pharmacy or counter. Other retailers alert shoppers to pseudoephedrine options in the main cold category aisle with shelf talkers and signage. In most cases, stacks of cards with real size pictures of the product being held behind the counter have been deployed on selves and display containers in line with non-regulated cold options. This technique provides a clever first glance perception that the selves are stocked with product, but as the shopper focuses in for the purchase, the options and instructions on how to purchase pseudoephedrine products become apparent.
Some store have created a subcategory of pseudoephedrine products, while others mix the branded product card packs in the cold category next to options within the brand and category.
When the shopper chooses a pseudoephedrine product, the branded card is presented to a clerk or pharmacist at the counter along with a drivers licenses. Name and address are then recorded into the logbook and a signature secured.
Behind the counter, some retailers have installed displays where pseudoephedrine products can be easily seen by shoppers at the counter. This provides additional visibility for the category and the opportunity to remind shoppers to stock up on a product that is not only restricted by being behind the counter, but is also limited by quantity for each household for a month. Providing a convenient reminder at the counter is yet another way to improve the shoppers experience by combining transactions at the counter.
Because the regulated process itself is an inconvenient two-step process for the shopper, adding conveniences and clarifiers help to provide for a better shopping experience and reduce the frustration of a new process that many will be experiencing for the first time this year.

Related

Retail–at the Crossroads

By Laura Davis-Taylor At new year’s beginning, I’ll cut to the chase. Numbers are being crunched,  and budgets are being honed for 08. What will happen, or should happen, if the writing on the wall or in the books points toward tougher going  in 2008 due to economic fluctuations and spending cuts? Will new at-retail tools, including in-store digital media, make further progress against stumbling older tools? Or will they too become budget cut victims? The retail outlook and 2008 budgets As we are being hit by some analysts with a panic-laced outlook on retail spending and the 2008 economy, many are concerned about the impact on our industry and what has appeared to be steady progress towards strategic innovation. It doesn’t help that 2007 is not panning out as a banner sales year for most retailers, the holiday quarter is being viewed with some trepidation and the effects of the 2008 election year are upon us. A Co

Private Label in Retail Study

Private label has been growing at twice the rate of famous household brands over the last 10 years. In fact sales of Wal-Mart’s private label brands is worth more than Unilever’s, PepsiCo’s and Coca-Cola’s put together and in more consolidated and sophisticated markets such as the UK, private label already accounts for about 50% of the shopping basket. So it’s hardly surprising that brand owners tend to view it as threat to their business, while retailers view it as an ever more important part of theirs. So who’s right? What does the future hold? Who’s going to win and who’s going to lose out with private label? In December 2006 and January 2007, Saatchi & Saatchi X in partnership with POPAI, undertook a global study as the basis for a forthcoming book on private label due to be published in November by Keith Lincoln and Lars Thomassen...

Retail, and the Healthy Child

By Jim Davidson, Polsinelli Shalton Welte Suelthaus The year 2007 will go down as a benchmark year for food manufacturing and advertising industry achievements designed to address the issue of childhood obesity in America.  Nevertheless, in spite of major leaps forward to change the nature of advertising directed at children under 12 years of age, and the introduction of a broad range of new “better for you” products, the pressure continues to mount in Washington, D.C. to adopt new regulatory restrictions or enact new legislation designed to regulate the advertising of food products.   All this is taking place during a year in which U.S. Senators Sam Brownback (R-KS) and Tom Harkin (D-IA), and Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin, have overseen the collaboration by a Joint Task Force on Childhood Obesity and the Media that is working to complete a comprehensive report to document the numerous programs initiated by f

Peerless for Retail

Peerless Industries, Inc. is introducing a new 42-inch flat panel TV ceiling mount for digital signage in retail locations.

MEC Retail Taps McGrath

MEC Retail, a division of Mediaedge:cia (MEC), a leading media communications specialist company, announced July 26th that it has named Ann McGrath, Client Services Director. McGrath will be responsible for managing existing clients Colgate-Palmolive, Cadbury Schweppes, and Pepperidge Farm and will focus on building business for MEC Retail and Retail Media Link. She will report to David Sommer, Managing Partner of MEC Retail. Prior to joining MEC Retail, McGrath managed customer marketing agency J. Brown, developing customer-specific initiatives such as menu marketing, co-equity media and top customer planning and programming for clients including FTD, Fort James, Nabisco/Kraft Foods, Dannon and Irving...

Through the Retail Looking Glass

By David Keene, Executive Editor, Marketing At Retail As we delve deeper and deeper into the issues at the heart of the new marketing shift to the retail space, it keeps getting "curiouser and curiouser". And I get that feeling, like Alice, that "I'm opening out like the largest telescope that ever was. Good-bye, feet." Goodbye feet, indeed. I think we're all feeling that solid ground is receding as we attempt to navigate a new retail environment with changing rules.

The Changing Retail Dynamic

By Matt Baker, AMD I think we've all had our share of look alike trends reports–usually very topical and statistic-heavy but generally leaving us with more questions than we had when we started reading. Going forward from the crossroads in this disruptive time in marketing, where we're seeing a shift to at retail marketing, and a concurrent shift from organizing supply to organizing demand, we need to

Marketing@Retail: the Demise of the Target Consumer

By: David Sommer, MEC Retail/Mediaedge:cia Advertising executives used to talk obsessively about “reaching” consumers.  “Who is our target?  How do we reach them as efficiently and effectively as possible with a differentiated and relevant message about our product?” Technology has now created a world where consumers no longer have targets painted on their foreheads and the usual marketing weapons miss the mark.