By Mark R. Mayfield On July 31, 2012
 |
| For its refinery in Jamnagar, India, Reliance Petroleum partnered with Barco. The videowall of 198 display cubes now helps Reliance enhance control of the refinery complex and optimize safety. |
Networks have transformed the capabilities of nearly every audiovisual
application. Historically, AV meant cart-bound single devices like 35mm
slide or overhead projectors wheeled into meeting rooms and classrooms.
Today, of course, thanks to technologies such as ethernet and IP, modern
devices can be permanently installed, linked together, and controlled on
LANs, WANs, and even the public internet. Network connectivity has
allowed AV technology to be used in ways never imagined even a decade
ago, especially in applications where visual information is paramount, like
operations centers.
When we think of an operations center control
room, the typical image is NASA mission control, like
the one in Houston, TX, at the Johnson Space Center.
The Mission Control Center appears as a dazzling
array of images and sound magically transmitted from
and to outer space. Today’s control rooms in industrial,
transportation, military, and corporate command/
control and operations centers are generally modeled
on the same experience. But that’s all changing with
the development of new technologies in networking,
displays, and user interface devices. Even the conceptual
limitation of confining control and monitoring to
a “room” seems to be disappearing.
First, let’s be clear about what a control room is.
Strictly speaking, it’s a place where events or activities
can be remotely monitored and controlled by one or
more individuals. And there are a lot of them, found
in many types of organizations. Most municipalities
have at least one control room or operations center,
and according to the United Nations Statistics
Division, there are nearly 4,000 cities “proper” with
populations over 100,000. According to experts interview
for this article, it’s safe to assume that every
large corporation has some sort of sophisticated
control room for its important assets. Every one of
the world’s 44,000 airports has some type of command/
control center. Command/control centers are
a common feature of the 1,000 U.S. military bases
around the world.
Collaboration in the Control
Room
But in recent years, where the emphasis has shifted
from merely sharing information to collectively acting
upon it—collaboration— the control room is
evolving to become a collaboration space. Within the
room, the star attraction is the multi-image display
wall. But even that’s evolving.
“The display wall industry has traditionally been
characterized as some array of displays with lots of
information that we need for whatever our business
might be — running a power plant, running a military
organization, traffic control,” says Brady Bruce,
vice president of marketing and strategic alliances
with Jupiter Systems. “We all get together and stand
in front of the display wall, and we look at that information.
We point at it, and we say ‘that’s something
we need to pay attention to, let’s fix that…’ The next
logical question is, does anybody else need to see this
information who can’t be in the room at the same
time with us? And how can we do that?”
Bruce says this scenario led his company to
ask questions about what it really means to share
information, and even the meaning of the term “collaboration”.
Especially in the dynamic control room
environment, true collaboration requires more than
just the ability to “co-view” information, he says.
“For us, collaboration means looking at the same
video streams at the same time, perhaps far apart from
each other, and the ability to annotate over those live
video stream, not simply share a still image,” Bruce
says. “Let’s talk about things happening right now. I
ought to be able to share as much information or as
many streams with you as I want to. And it shouldn’t
matter what device you’re on. So if you happen to be
in another control room, or on your laptop or tablet,
we should be able to share information. So deviceagnostic
without regard to geography — when I need
your help, I need your help. We need to be able to
interact on the same thing right now. That’s what collaboration
is all about.”
Network Issues
Traditionally, the network has been limited to the role
of one-way conduit to deliver source information to
the videowall processor. As the literal and figurative
centerpiece of any operations center, the multi-image
display (or videowall) provides visualization of a
nearly unlimited number of source images. In centralized
configuration, sources can be direct-connected
or delivered over IP networks into the videowall processor
to be sized, positioned and displayed on the
videowall. High-resolution video still presents a challenge
for some networks, but this may be changing.
“There is certainly a trend to at least investigate
transmitting video signals over a network when
designing a control room, says RGB Spectrum’s executive
vice president Scott Norder. “However, in many
cases, contemporary IP networks are unable to accommodate
uncompressed video at full frame rates and
resolution. Information accuracy is critical in most
control rooms and this requirement conflicts with
the limitations of the bandwidth available on IP networks.
Therefore, we see video to the displays over a
separate video signal path and control running over
the IP network.”
Recently, it’s become possible to use the network
not only to receive sources, but also to share videowall
content. But given the highly sensitive, mission-critical
nature of most operations center control room applications,
two familiar issues need to be addressed:
network bandwidth and security.
According to Peter Bussens, Barco’s market director
for controls rooms and simulation, these concerns
can be addressed by using a dedicated network. “In
most of these environments, people will choose a
visualization AV network which is separate from the
corporate network,” he says. “The reason for that is
mainly to be able to control bandwidth availability
and secondly for security aspects. But
it’s not a necessity; we can and we
do, in certain applications, run over
the standard corporate network. And in
most applications, we interface with the
corporate network.”
Bussens points to Barco’s
TransFormN, a control room management
system consisting of I/O devices,
servers, controllers, and software, as a
versatile tool that allows this type of
collaboration between networks. Barco
calls the “networked visualization”.
Connections between the visualization
network and the corporate network are
typically done at the network level (level
3 on the OSI 7 Layer model) using routers
over a VPN (virtual private network).
Cloud computing offers tech managers the option
to outsource many kinds of data processing including
video, but given the nature of the highly-sensitive
content common in control room applications, does
the cloud make sense? Among IT pros and command/
control center operators, there is some debate about
this, and it’s all centered on security. Earlier this year,
Harris Corporation, the $6 billion communications
technology company, announced that it is selling its
super-secure data center in Harrisonburg, Virginia and
leaving the “cloud computing” business. A February
28, 2012 press release stated that both its government
and commercial customers prefer hosting “missioncritical
information” on their own premises rather
than in the cloud. Whether “private”, public, or
hybrid, any cloud solution ultimately
requires a data center that’s located
somewhere, so it becomes a question of
the data security expertise of the cloud
solutions provider.
 |
| Mission Control Center, Johnson Space Center |
RGB Spectrum’s Norder suggests
security concerns, which have been
front and center for the last decade,
are finally being adequately addressed
by IT providers. He says, “VPN technology
and security has come a long
way in the last decade, and information
security over the WAN/Internet
is well understood by most every IT
professional. In most control rooms, IT
defines the security strategies for local
and remote resources, trains the users
and management, and measures the success of the
security schemes.”
Scalability
One of the great promises of cloud-based architectures
is that you don’t have to invest in physical
infrastructure that your organization may outgrow
or may one day become obsolete. An advantage of
a “networked visualization” platform like Barco’s
TransFormN is the ability to easily add both sources
and displays. Barco claims that systems that rely
on fixed, physical chassis-based architectures restrict
control room operators to a finite number of inputs
and outputs, limiting expansion capability. But with
a distributed architecture delivered over a standard IP
network (like TransFormN), as needs grow, users can
add virtually unlimited number of I/Os by simply
linking additional external components.
Portable Control Rooms
The reality of network-based command/control room
coupled with the explosion of mobile devices naturally
leads to the question: Do control rooms really need
to be rooms at all? Technology managers are being
asked to provide mobile solutions for every other AV/
IT solution—is there demand for mobile control room
functionality? It depends on who you ask.
“There’s a lot of hype around this [mobility] but
we haven’t had requests for viewing applications
for mobile technology,” says Barco’s Bussens. “But
it’s something we’re looking at.” Of course, some
technology managers see beyond the hype of mobile
devices, and recognize the practical advantages such
technologies offer. A CIO at a state police EOC (emergency
operations center) commented, “As people
become more dependent on video for situational
awareness and forensic investigations, the need to do
these tasks remotely or at the scene will continue to
grow. As IT supporters we need to continue find ways
to accommodate these needs system wide. Several of
the application developers are implementing mobile
tools in their environments.”
Jupiter is one of them. “Command/control rooms
really haven’t been mobile, and they need to be,” says
Brady Bruce. “A user may not need to see the whole
wall. But if you want me to see something important,
it’s probably one or a handful of streams, so that’s what
you share.” Jupiter’s new Canvas system enables sources
on the traditional display wall to be shared with
colleagues in other rooms, or logged onto their PCs
or mobile devices. It currently runs on the Windows
8 platform, but future plans will include iOS devices.
Mark R. Mayfield is an independent consultant,
analyst, and writer in the communications technology
industries. He can be reached at mmayf56@hotmail.com.
Reliance Petroleum
Fact Sheet
• Exporting more than one million
barrels of oil per day
• 1.6% of global nominal crude
processing capacity
• 8 rear-projection video walls
• Additional rear-projection wall in
the crisis room
• Counting 198 display cubes of 67
inches with XGA resolution
• Desktop of 49152x3072 pixels visualizing
all key performance indicators
(Source: Barco)
A Networked Visualization System
In a networked visualization system, sources (a road camera, a sensor, a computer, etc.) are connected to an encoder to
get the video, images, or data into the secure IP-based system. The standard internet infrastructure will transport this
information to anywhere there’s an internet connection. At the destination side, a decoder makes sure the information is
ready for use on any display or videowall. Service nodes can be added to the network for additional processing.
Source: Barco
Best Practices for
Control Rooms
Plan for mobility. Your constituents expect it
everywhere else in the organization—it’s just a
matter of time before control rooms go mobile.
Plan for growth. Consider a network-based
approach to accommodate expansion.
Enable Collaboration. Look for ways to
allow users to collaborate with their videowalls
among colleagues, not just look at them
together.
Keep it Safe. Security issues are paramount in
the control room, since the visual display data is
usually mission critical, real-time, and can sometimes
save lives. Follow the most current IT best
practices for securing VPNs and other networks.
Use fiber optic signal distribution where feasible
to prevent “eavesdropping” and problems caused
by electromagnetic interference.